Two-year postdoc position in Urban Development
Revisiting Allmänningar and Stråk: Spatial Justice in the 21st century Urban-Rural Land Regime
Please note that fluency in Swedish is a requirement for this position. The postdoc is expected to be hired during autumn/winter 2020. Last day to apply through the Malmö University portal, September 15th.
Job ID: REK 2020/156
The aim of the project is to investigate spatial justice by analysing usage and planning of public spaces that connect urban-rural environments and socio-economic different neighbourhoods in the post-industrial landscape. The research project ‘revisits’ the Old Norse concepts of allmänning [commons] and stråk [pathways]. Both these concepts represent publicly accessible places that people have a right to use and a right to move through – aspects of central importance for a socially and environmentally sustainable development.
In the post-industrial landscape, public spaces are dispersed and isolated. While there is a decrease in both accessibility to and the size of public space per inhabitant in cities, there is simultaneously an increase in new public spaces, such as pocket-parks, outdoor gyms, social events, and pedestrian paths. In rural areas, wetlands and urban fringes are transformed into recreational areas and so-called beträdor [walk-on’s] on private farmland made available to the public. But this contradictory transformation of urban and rural environments does not develop evenly, and there is a risk that socio-economically vulnerable groups are hit hardest by densification and privatisation.
The research team will analyse statistics, carry out interviews, map socio-economic differences, and, map commons and pathways in nine cases in the three Southern municipalities of Malmö, Lund and Staffanstorp. The project is organized around three inter-related work packages and research questions:
- WP 1. HISTORICAL TRACES. What are the historical definitions of Allmänning/commons and Stråk/pathways? Where were key historical commons and pathways located? For which activities are (remnants of) these spaces still used?
- WP 2. PLANNING. How are ideological-political assumptions about use-value and mobility expressed in planning pathways and commons, and to what extent is urban-rural connectivity considered and implemented in planning?
- WP 3. PRACTICES. How do users appropriate commons and pathways, which activities do users identify as significant, what negotiations take place between individuals and groups and how does use and movement patterns vary between socio-economic and urban-rural locations?
The project evolves around a collaborative network consisting of officials from regional institutions; an international expert group of scholars and artists who analyse, design and map community-oriented and environmental aspects of public space; a higher education network, and, the strong research environments at Malmö, Alnarp and Roskilde universities. A wide range of mapping activities, seminars, workshops, walk-alongs and interventions will facilitate inclusion of user and activist groups, of professionals, artist, students and researchers alike – aiming to support co-production of knowledge and accessibility to results, and, to boost the projects contribution to education and to the surrounding society. Results will be presented in international research articles, a co-authored book based on the maps produced throughout the research project, and, an exhibition at the end of the project.
The project is funded through the Formas initiative Sustainable Living Environments [Gestaltad Livsmiljö] and runs between 2019 and 2022. The research team consists of:
- Principal investigator Karin Grundström, Associate Professor at the Department of Urban Studies, Malmö University
- David Pinder, Professor at People and Technology, Roskilde University, Denmark
- Anders Larsson, Senior lecturer at Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, the University for Agricultural Sciences/Alnarp
- Peter Parker, Senior lecturer at the Department of Urban Studies, Malmö University
- Martin Grander, Researcher at the Department of Urban Studies, Malmö University
- Cecilia Wendt, Independent artist
Asplund J. (2004). Hur låter åskan: förstudium till en vetenskapsteori. Lund: Bokförlaget Korpen.
Bauman, Z. (2002). The Individualized Society. London: Polity Press.
Brighenti, A. M., (2016). The Public and the Common: Some Approximations of Their Contemporary Articulation. Critical Inquiry (42) 2 pp. 306-328.
Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social & Legal Studies, 17(3), 311-331.
Broadbent, G. (2009) Emerging concepts in urban space design. London: Spon press.
Creswell, et al. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Wiley.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the Move, mobility in the modern Western world. New York NY: Routledge.
Cosgrove, D. (2005) Maps, mapping, art and cartography in the twentieth century, Imago Mundi (57) 1, 35-56.
Fainstein, S. (2010) The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell university press.
Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006). Five misunderstandings of case study research. Qualitative Inquiry (12):2, p. 219-245.
Grundström, K. (2019) Stråk – planning for connectivity in the segregated city. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (31) 1, 9-32.
Gyllin, M., Haaland, C., Larsson, A., Peterson, A. (2008). Beträdor och andra grönstråk – om landskapets åtkomlighet i fullåkersbygderna. Gröna Fakta 2/2008, Movium, Alnarp.
Harvey, David (2011). Spaces of global capitalism. Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Atlas.
Hedin, K., Clark, E., Lundholm, E., & Malmberg G. (2012). Neoliberalization of housing in Sweden: Gentrification, filtering, and social polarization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(2), 443_463
Jensen, Ol. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movement – urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice, Mobilities 4(1) 139-158.
Kvale, S. (1997) Qualitative research interviews. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lefebvre, Henri (1974 (2007)). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lefebvre, H. (1992) Rhythmanalysis, space, time and everyday life. London:Continuum.
Mitchell, D. (2003) The right to the city. Social justice and the fight for public space. London: The Guilford Press.
Parker, P., & Schmidt, S. (2017). Enabling urban commons. CoDesign, 13(3), 202-213.
Pinder, D. (2011) Errant paths: the poetics and politics of walking.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29, p. 672-692 20 p.
Pinder, D. (2018) Transforming cities: on the passage of situationist Dérive. Performance research; a journal of the performative arts, 23, 7, p. 18-28
Sachs, W (ed) (1993) Global Ecology. A New Arena of Political Conflict, Zed Books
Solnit, R. (2000) Wanderlust. A history of walking. New York: Penguin Books.
Soya E. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. University of Minnesota Press.
Swyngedouw, E (2007) Impossible Sustainability and the Post-political Condition, in D.Gibbs & R.
Krueger The Sustainable Development Paradox, Guildford Press
Urry, J. (2007) Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Volont, L. (2019). DIY Urbanism and the Lens of the Commons: Observations from Spain. City & Community.
Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven (91) 66–77. Sage Publications.
Wood, D. (2010) Everything Sings. Maps for a narrative Atlas. Los Angeles: Siglio.